Saturday, March 10, 2012

Modern warfare 3 or Battlefield for multiplayer?

Why?Modern warfare 3 or Battlefield for multiplayer?
Battlefield 3 easily, for multiplayer much more interactive, environment changes and its not just pointing and shooting having strategy and cooperation always helps! Also cool to know that when 5 people know where you are you can toss a grenade at a tree and hide in the debris that follows.



Call of Duty MW3 isn't bad, but it's the same as the rest just with upgraded graphics. Not really a different game and the multiplayer can get boring very quickly.



I bought BF3 and play it constantly, I bought CoDMW3 and played a little multiplayer, got bored and beat campaign, took disc out and put BF3 in and played with some friends :)



Happy Gaming!
Please trust me and get Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, it's much better. When i got black ops, people said Battlefield Bad Company 2 was better, I got it and I absolutely hated it; it was a waste of money. In my opinion, Battlefield gives a good example of a war game, but Call of Duty gives a lot of shooting, the main stuff you would do in a war.
That is why I suggest Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, it doesn't get boring, there's a lot of things to do, it's amazing and absolutely fun.Modern warfare 3 or Battlefield for multiplayer?
First off I think the die hard fans of each game will always recommend theirs over the other, slating the gameplay etc.



For me I'm a massive CoD4 fan, was very disappointed with Black Ops and have recently bought MW:3. Its a lot better than BO and from whatI have heard very similiar to MW:2, so for this reason I would see if you can borrow it from a friend so see if you enjoyed MW:2 as its the same engine with a few tweaks and very similar gameplay.



BF I have no experience of but it looks very good. I have heard on BF games you are more team reliant and less of a "lone gun", however MW:3 has some fantastic new game modes which are very team orientated.



GL
I have both, both are great and worth buying but, battlefield has larger maps, destructible buildings (it is fun dropping a wall on someone hiding behind a car or wall), and vehicles; it makes playing much more dynamic and fun being able to jump in a jet, helicopter, tank, jeep etc. I think the campaign and zombies of MW are better, but for online multilayer, go with battlefield, or at least give it a try too.Modern warfare 3 or Battlefield for multiplayer?
I am so tired of Call of Duty... I still have a copy of Black Ops unopened and still in the wrapper. Got it LAST CHRISTMAS and had no interest to play it because its the same freaking thing, just with new levels. I'm tired of having to start over at level 1 and working my way up to unlock everything.



So annoying.



I vote Battlefield
Depends, do prefer some more of the same, or a ridiculously overhyped clunky more of the same?
MW3. Battlefield get boring really fast and there are more thiings to do on mw3.

No comments:

Post a Comment